Re: EPEL support in "master" branch (aka speeding up Fedora development)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Dne 23.1.2018 v 03:55 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a):
>>>>>> "VO" == Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> VO> I think FPC does not know.
>
> Certainly we know what we generally try to do, but Fedora changes
> quickly and some things aren't always stated as well as they could be.
> Plus the experts who draft the more esoteric guidelines often have other
> ideas.
>
> The guidelines cover everything from the oldest supported release to
> rawhide.  Where they don't we try to indicate that.  When sections get
> outdated, I will generally remove them (and shift them to the EPEL packaging
> page) but sometimes I miss something.
>
> VO> Let me quote from Ruby guidelines update [1] which initially aimed
> VO> on Rawhide, now it covers all supported Fedoras,
>
> I personally wasn't aware that it does. 

Well, at the end of the first meeting, I promised to update the
guidelines to cover all Fedora versions and I did that:

https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/710#comment-466654

> To be completely honest you
> were pretty argumentative about the whole issue 

Sorry, I was, since the later discussion was about EPEL again:

https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/710#comment-470435

I hope that now, when we both agree that the guidelines are for Fedora,
the guidelines proposal is going to be accepted soon.


V.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux