On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 02:23:16PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > What I'm trying to say here is that each time we want to implement > some feature in Fedora, we either need to have some replacement in > EPEL or diverge Fedora branches from EPEL branches. Having > replacement is not always possible, especially if we start utilizing > new (actually 8 years old) features of RPM. I'd really like to see us tend towards coming up with macros that provide elegant fallbacks on EPEL. (The %license macro is a good example.) I get the frustration with older stuff holding us back, but we really have a _lot_ of users who get value from doing so. https://twitter.com/mattdm/status/936243506355621888 -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
