-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 14:33 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 02:23:16PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > What I'm trying to say here is that each time we want to implement > > some feature in Fedora, we either need to have some replacement in > > EPEL or diverge Fedora branches from EPEL branches. Having > > replacement is not always possible, especially if we start utilizing > > new (actually 8 years old) features of RPM. > > I'd really like to see us tend towards coming up with macros that > provide elegant fallbacks on EPEL. (The %license macro is a good > example.) There is no fallback for rich dependencies. There is no fallback for filetriggers. > I get the frustration with older stuff holding us back, but we really > have a _lot_ of users who get value from doing so. > https://twitter.com/mattdm/status/936243506355621888 I'm definitely not against supporting EPEL, but right now it is hurting me that much that I don't do that. - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlpm19gACgkQaVcUvRu8 X0wXzg//ZJsgRXLmkEaSyLpVqpEWq0cZ676rjN6TVkwzQEeCVjVDjnlbPZ33A0Sc R+rFOUIymJ7dDz/jToTvMBuHBzsAHn594a+9UBs36TqAV71OruxCAM1n8N1cAkWW h9s0cHF0JdBJiukDBhs96vXS8Dnvv7FRlFHMvl/rfhxAIGSn8M+cxk4M+ils59EL nwKqrO08SQdnU93jHU86LCG9vSQlR0k2c2KsCUtVNjhkdv2RAj02Na6idxvn7OzD 4OqE6WkX8npUC+5vcdid3bfzAyxRCbxUPZ5+HctHCXVkRCd/o/3rVPr7ei+BAYkw VV8MBn56OTYckHm0Bhd6eZjqA1SqhVHnGulH5NzHiHiXhCWOdbDJUjNTqPkQWfYQ A6YqL7N/gB6rOkylm4sq/sbkQXvbXdnr1s0mgrWvCLmE+DA7NGYTbm5mZye5/LZL E3tZeev4YIxOnuqK1w/D54j0Y+N0oj4bSG4LQHtqW3FAOrsbg7dOIT0YKAs6KGfu VuYzVMqkACW9iKVScfsQzNMagND0VoLNrNymf5uI8PwXLNPeRsqZfOhu5tNFLvA8 5yQ1+qunHF4990/licBTiFeBtNRSQ9oWKHmn30+7IlTe43OvEbatwyzj4UaZ3Wtt eH395saHfPiJVO+8G4smSZ5MZVl9LhAa+sg7dY7d9fxSFtBr1XU= =TP1T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
