Dne 22.1.2018 v 11:50 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
> On 01/22/2018 08:40 AM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>> Problem only is that as Fedora is on the constant move but RH doesn't.
>> Main RH goal is delivery solid distro, then security fixes and some
>> other critical fixes. Only occasionally they are updating some set of
>> packages.
>
> It really depends on the package. Some packages see frequent rebases
> and can even be ahead of what is in Fedora releases.
In this context, I would like to point out that we should not speak
about EPEL{6,7} guidelines, because they might evolve between RHEL minor
releases.
For example, Ruby in RHEL 7.4 has backported most of the macros
available for packaging rubygem -packages in the most recent Fedora. But
there macros are not available in RHEL 7.3.
Also, I would like to point out that FPC or whoever else in community
has hardly anything to say into something like EPEL Ruby guidelines,
because these guidelines are driven purely by RHEL (although I want to
make the packaging as similar as possible with Fedora).
Vít
>
> People who need absolute stability use EUS, and not the mainstream
> y-stream and z-stream updates for Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The
> amount of changes that go into the distribution can be quite
> surprising, especially who have previously used Debian stable (which
> is more like EUS in the amount of updates that happen).
>
> Thanks,
> Florian
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
