Hi, I did the rebuilds yesterday. totpcgi, python-django-dynamite, libappindicator failed to rebuild for unrelated reasons, bugs have been filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528774, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528798, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528799. Let me know if you encounter any problems with the rebuilds I did. Zbyszek On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 05:24:40PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 03:06:35PM +0100, Iryna Shcherbina wrote: > > Hi, > > > > if the timing is not good, then I can take the generated patch set > > and turn it into Pagure Pull Requests with a script. Packagers would > > be able to review/merge them during the holidays and we can merge > > the rest on January 2nd. This is just a suggestion, let me know if > > it sounds like an idea and if it would be of any help. > > Thanks, but I don't think that's necessary. I doubt many packagers > would merge stuff over the holidays, so there wouldn't be much > difference between that and just pushing directly. > > I want to use PRs for the few packages that are more complex > (listed in my original e-mail, e.g. kernel and pyqt4), but that's > just ~10 packages, so that can be done by hand. > > Zbyszek > > > > > > Regards, > > Iryna Shcherbina > > > > On 12/18/2017 02:41 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > >On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 01:05:03PM +0000, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > >>On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 3:16 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > > >>zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > > >>>Dear fellow Fedora developers, > > >>> > > >>>I plan to execute part 2 of the renaming. First part was announced and > > >>>discussed here [1]. Recently, Iryna Shcherbina announced [2] plans for > > >>>a follow up: changing the requirements. Before that happens I want to > > >>>finish my renaming. In this round my changes are rather small, only > > >>>~80 packages, see the lists below. There's various packages which either > > >>>are not on the porting-db list [3], or are particularly complicated [4], > > >>>or have been fixed in git but don't build, all of which I'm ignoring > > >>>for now. > > >>> > > >>>Short description: > > >>>binary Python2 subpackages with a name starting with "python-" or > > >>>ending with "-python" will be renamed to "python2-…". Provides/Obsoletes > > >>>for the old name are of course added, so upgrades should work and other > > >>>packages using the old names do not need to be adjusted. > > >>> > > >>>In the first round, packages which had Requires/Provides under > > >>>conditionals were skipped. In this round the renamer script [5] was > > >>>improved to support such cases. > > >>> > > >>>Timeline: > > >>>If nothing pops up, I'll push the changes and to the rebuilds on Friday. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>This timeline is a bit concerning. Friday marks the start of the lowest > > >>maintainer activity each year. A huge subset of the Fedora community goes > > >>away to enjoy their winter holidays. > > >> > > >>I think pushing a mass-packaging change on this schedule would be a really > > >>bad idea. It *will* result in breakage. I'd suggest postponing the change > > >>until January 2nd. > > >Actually that's on purpose: I wanted to do the rebuilds over the > > >holidays, without bothering anybody or interfering with anybody's > > >work. In case there are any regressions, people will most likely > > >report them early in January so there'll be time to fix everything > > >when everybody is back to work and fresh. > > > > > >Zbyszek > > >_______________________________________________ > > >devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
