On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 03:06:35PM +0100, Iryna Shcherbina wrote: > Hi, > > if the timing is not good, then I can take the generated patch set > and turn it into Pagure Pull Requests with a script. Packagers would > be able to review/merge them during the holidays and we can merge > the rest on January 2nd. This is just a suggestion, let me know if > it sounds like an idea and if it would be of any help. Thanks, but I don't think that's necessary. I doubt many packagers would merge stuff over the holidays, so there wouldn't be much difference between that and just pushing directly. I want to use PRs for the few packages that are more complex (listed in my original e-mail, e.g. kernel and pyqt4), but that's just ~10 packages, so that can be done by hand. Zbyszek > > Regards, > Iryna Shcherbina > > On 12/18/2017 02:41 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 01:05:03PM +0000, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >>On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 3:16 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > >>zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>>Dear fellow Fedora developers, > >>> > >>>I plan to execute part 2 of the renaming. First part was announced and > >>>discussed here [1]. Recently, Iryna Shcherbina announced [2] plans for > >>>a follow up: changing the requirements. Before that happens I want to > >>>finish my renaming. In this round my changes are rather small, only > >>>~80 packages, see the lists below. There's various packages which either > >>>are not on the porting-db list [3], or are particularly complicated [4], > >>>or have been fixed in git but don't build, all of which I'm ignoring > >>>for now. > >>> > >>>Short description: > >>>binary Python2 subpackages with a name starting with "python-" or > >>>ending with "-python" will be renamed to "python2-…". Provides/Obsoletes > >>>for the old name are of course added, so upgrades should work and other > >>>packages using the old names do not need to be adjusted. > >>> > >>>In the first round, packages which had Requires/Provides under > >>>conditionals were skipped. In this round the renamer script [5] was > >>>improved to support such cases. > >>> > >>>Timeline: > >>>If nothing pops up, I'll push the changes and to the rebuilds on Friday. > >>> > >>> > >>This timeline is a bit concerning. Friday marks the start of the lowest > >>maintainer activity each year. A huge subset of the Fedora community goes > >>away to enjoy their winter holidays. > >> > >>I think pushing a mass-packaging change on this schedule would be a really > >>bad idea. It *will* result in breakage. I'd suggest postponing the change > >>until January 2nd. > >Actually that's on purpose: I wanted to do the rebuilds over the > >holidays, without bothering anybody or interfering with anybody's > >work. In case there are any regressions, people will most likely > >report them early in January so there'll be time to fix everything > >when everybody is back to work and fresh. > > > >Zbyszek > >_______________________________________________ > >devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
