On 14 November 2017 at 09:50, Marek Skalický <mskalick@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Christopher píše v St 08. 11. 2017 v 22:33 +0000: >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:27 PM Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobrain@fedorapr >> oject.org> wrote: >> > On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 18:58 +0000, Christopher wrote: >> > > Hi, I've been reading a lot lately about Fedora modularity, and >> > I'm >> > > still a >> > > bit confused on some points. >> > > >> > > Is it necessary for maintainers to create modules for their RPM >> > > packages? >> > Yes. >> > > First of all, I'm not modularity expert. Sharing only what I figured > out during creation of module for my package. > >> When will they need to do this? And, how? >> Do I need to create a module per-RPM? > > Not per-RPM. But > > " If you see that your module needs a common package (like net-tools), > you shouldn’t bundle them either. They should be split into individual > modules. " > This makes me a sad panda ;) I get what you are saying but net-tools is a really bad package to pick on given efforts to follow through with deprecating it! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
