Re: Kernel 4.13 rebase plans

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> But if Negativo users start complaining that their computers don't
> boot anymore, then we'll definitely need to stop doing major kernel
> updates ("taking the entire distro hostage" I guess) as the Negativo
> support is important for product strategy. Hopefully it doesn't come
> to that.

Just... no.

I don't use nVidia hardware (in part because of the driver shenanigans)
and I had not heard of Negativo before today.  That's not Fedora, and
certainly should not dictate how Fedora is run.

If any third-party repo wants to dictate kernel update requirements,
they can maintain their own kernels.  There is zero reason for all
Fedora users to suffer because of non-Fedora repos.
-- 
Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux