On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:43:21AM -0500, mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 8:41 AM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Pretty sure the last testing I did with the details form Hans's blog[0]
> > the behaviour was that if the nvidia driver failed then the nouveau
> > driver was a fallback (rather than the older instructions that totally
> > blacklisted it leaving no GPU at all).
>
> If that fallback is working, then I guess that's fine. (Though I'm not
> speaking for the whole Working Group here... perhaps others expect it to
> always work, I'm not sure.)
>
> But if Negativo users start complaining that their computers don't boot
> anymore, then we'll definitely need to stop doing major kernel updates
> ("taking the entire distro hostage" I guess) as the Negativo support is
> important for product strategy. Hopefully it doesn't come to that.
I cannot believe what I read. I don't think there would ever be
agreement to forfeit one of the greatest Fedora strength - current
kernel – for the sake of users of proprietary driver from 3rd repo!
--
Tomasz Torcz Only gods can safely risk perfection,
xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx it's a dangerous thing for a man. -- Alia
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
