On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Tom Hughes <tom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/09/17 15:43, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> We're getting to crunch time, here. Should we: >>> >>> a) scramble to get these things in place >>> b) postpone the change until F28 (Release Modular Server as another >>> Boltron?) >>> c) ask FESCo to delay the overall schedule to make this work? >>> >>> >>> If "a", what's the plan? >> >> >> I personally think that c) is really the only option at this point >> without making a complete and utter mockery of the Change system. > > > Surely (c) would make a mockery of change system. What would not make a > mockery of the change system would be to invoke the contingency plan. Yep, that's what I meant, sorry a bit jet lagged after an overnight flight. It needs to go to failback which I believe was to ship standard Server as per F-26 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
