On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Tom Hughes <tom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/09/17 15:43, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> We're getting to crunch time, here. Should we: >>> >>> a) scramble to get these things in place >>> b) postpone the change until F28 (Release Modular Server as another >>> Boltron?) >>> c) ask FESCo to delay the overall schedule to make this work? >>> >>> >>> If "a", what's the plan? >> >> >> I personally think that c) is really the only option at this point >> without making a complete and utter mockery of the Change system. > > > Surely (c) would make a mockery of change system. What would not make a > mockery of the change system would be to invoke the contingency plan. > > Except there doesn't seem to be one: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Modular_Server#Contingency_Plan > > The contingency seems to be that there isn't one and we just have to hold > the release until they're ready which I guess is (c) but it means the > contingency plan itself is a mockery. > > So how exactly did that get accepted? > It got approved because it must be approved. :) -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
