On 08/09/17 15:43, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We're getting to crunch time, here. Should we:
a) scramble to get these things in place
b) postpone the change until F28 (Release Modular Server as another
Boltron?)
c) ask FESCo to delay the overall schedule to make this work?
If "a", what's the plan?
I personally think that c) is really the only option at this point
without making a complete and utter mockery of the Change system.
Surely (c) would make a mockery of change system. What would not make a
mockery of the change system would be to invoke the contingency plan.
Except there doesn't seem to be one:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Modular_Server#Contingency_Plan
The contingency seems to be that there isn't one and we just have to
hold the release until they're ready which I guess is (c) but it means
the contingency plan itself is a mockery.
So how exactly did that get accepted?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (tom@xxxxxxxxxx)
http://compton.nu/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
