On 09/08/2017 10:51 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: > Surely (c) would make a mockery of change system. What would not make a > mockery of the change system would be to invoke the contingency plan. > > Except there doesn't seem to be one: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Modular_Server#Contingency_Plan I suggest option (b), delaying modularity until Fedora 28, though I agree that it's problematic that there doesn't seem to be a contingency plan defined here. Speaking from Bodhi's perspective, I think we should have had modular functionality in Bodhi before the beta freeze. Technically there is also a Bodhi change request to add non-RPM artifacts (modules) that is also not done. It makes me nervous to make such a large change in Bodhi so close to the final freeze. Delaying the modular server release until F28 will give us time to work out bugs in Bodhi and other tooling and help us to release a more solid server product to our users.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
