On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 08:26 +0100, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Also, if I mark a security update as low priority, that means it > really is low priority. There's no need for many security updates to > skip batched. Many are e.g. minor DoS vulnerabilities that are > unlikely to be exploited ever, let alone in the next two weeks. Of > course remote code execution problems should probably skip batched, > but those are unlikely to be marked as low priority. ;) I feel a bit on the fence about this, but I see that mattdm +1'd it. If you feel strongly about it, please comment on the pull request to this effect.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
