Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 22:51 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 22:13 -0400, Ben Rosser wrote:
> > 2. If we do implement this, could we consider not batching new
> > package
> > updates in addition to security and "urgent" updates? New package
> > updates wouldn't get downloaded onto users systems upon running
> > "dnf
> > upgrade", so the update process would still *feel* batched from an
> > end-user point of view. But we would simultaneously be able to
> > deliver
> > new software quickly to users, or at least as quickly as we do
> > today.
> > (I find that people rarely test new package updates, or at least
> > rarely test them and give karma, which means that a newpackage
> > request
> > generally sits the full 7 or 14 days in bodhi-- so I don't think we
> > should add up to 7 days to that timetable).
> 
> That's a good suggestion that I hadn't though about. Sure, I think
> that's a good idea - care to propose it on the pull request yourself
> since it was your idea? This is the line where an "or self.type is
> newpackage" would go:
> 
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/1678/files#diff-6406e7faaf
> 25263056c68009517cf66dR2376

If a new package needs an updated library from another package, then
the update in Bodhi would contain both a new package and an update.

Should that still go directly to request:stable? Or does the (non-
urgent) update make it go to request:batched?


-- 
Mathieu
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux