Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Randy Barlow
<bowlofeggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It would be activated whenever the Bodhi that has it is deployed.
> However, it won't be a forced policy - developers will still be free to
> click "push to stable" if they please. The autokarma feature will
> simply move updates to batched now. Once the UI work is completed, the
> plan is for the UI to offer a "push to batched" option for testing
> updates that meet the 7 day criteria, and a "push to stable" button for
> all batched updates. Thus, I didn't think it would be necessary to file
> for a change, but I'd be happy to do so if it is necessary.
>

Oh! Somehow I misunderstood what the change actually was. This seems
entirely reasonable. :)

>
> That's a good suggestion that I hadn't though about. Sure, I think
> that's a good idea - care to propose it on the pull request yourself
> since it was your idea? This is the line where an "or self.type is
> newpackage" would go:
>
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/1678/files#diff-6406e7faaf25263056c68009517cf66dR2376

Certainly; I've left a comment on the PR suggesting this.

Ben Rosser
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux