El mar, 01-08-2017 a las 08:26 +0100, Michael Catanzaro escribió: > Keep in mind that GNOME Software already only checks for non-security > updates weekly. So it will actually take as much as two weeks for the > update to reach users once it enters batched, which I suspect may not > have been intended. We are really looking at weekly updates with an > additional one-week delay. Probably you were intending to implement > weekly updates without that delay, which seems more desirable? If so, > coordination with the Software developers will be needed. > > Also, if I mark a security update as low priority, that means it > really is low priority. There's no need for many security updates to > skip batched. Many are e.g. minor DoS vulnerabilities that are > unlikely to be exploited ever, let alone in the next two weeks. Of > course remote code execution problems should probably skip batched, > but those are unlikely to be marked as low priority. ;) > > Michael gnome-software really should follow what we ship, in what you describe we have the potential of making some parts worse for users. because there is a non null probability that users will lose the ability to install deltarpms. I would really like to see us have a single unified view on update management at a distro level and not having different tools implementing their own behaviours. Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
