Re: Two more concrete ideas for what a once-yearly+update schedule would look like

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 08:26:04AM +0100, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Keep in mind that GNOME Software already only checks for
> non-security updates weekly. So it will actually take as much as two

Doesn't it check daily but only *alert* weekly? AFAIK there's no way to
just ask our servers for security updates; the process is to ask for
any updates, and then select only the security ones. (Right?)

> Also, if I mark a security update as low priority, that means it
> really is low priority. There's no need for many security updates to
> skip batched. Many are e.g. minor DoS vulnerabilities that are
> unlikely to be exploited ever, let alone in the next two weeks. Of
> course remote code execution problems should probably skip batched,
> but those are unlikely to be marked as low priority. ;)

+1 to this.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux