On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 08:35:58AM +0200, nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Working on it is fine. Improving it is fine. Proposing > Fedora-generated Flatpacks outside of Fedora is fine. > > Planning to ship stuff as Flatpack only when basic questions such as > inter-component dependencies, automated deployment (kickstarts), > actual network and disk use (chromebooks), actual user adoption, > actual convenience of the security model, etc are not resolved is > not. That's the hard and tedious stuff most people on this list care > about and GUI app writers, not a lot. That's the point of no easy > return where Flatpack is forced on users be it ready or not. *Planning* to do something when not all of the questions are answered is a natural consequence of doing that planning in the open and as part of a collaborative community rather than doing closed-source or closed-source-like developement. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
