On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 11:56:26AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:04:37PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > On 14 July 2017 at 20:28, Andreas Tunek <andreas.tunek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Is this really more reliable than using dnf (for graphical packages > > > like Recepies and Builder)? > > > > It's hugely more reliable. You can't actually trust rpm to do anything > > atomically, > > Which could be fixed and the fix would benefit everyone ... > > > and this is the main reason we force upgrade to be offline > > in the workstation product. > > No, that's a workaround for not fixing it properly. No, that's not true. (I love one-liners.) _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
