Re: Fedora 27 mass rebuild at risk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Just to don't confuse you:

I kinda used your Mass Rebuild for my intensions - updgrade of MariaDB library. So there will be some packages broken by me.
But we actively monitoring and fixing them.

I be glad, if the Mass Rebuild started *after* this build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20495924, however s390 seems stuck for half an hour by now :(
But go on, star when you need, don't get blocked by me.

Thanks! :)


--

Michal Schorm
Associate Software Engineer
Core Services - Databases Team
Red Hat

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 07:48:00AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 12.7.2017 v 16:09 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 02:53:36PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> We currently have an invalid IFUNC resolver in libgcc.a on POWER
> >> (rhbz#1467526).  glibc in rawhide recently started linking that into the
> >> library and there are significant problems with that (rhbz#1467518).
> >>
> >> I'll be on PTO next week, and it does not seem likely that this is going
> >> to be resolved upstream before that.  If upstream (both glibc GCC are
> >> involved) don't come up with a solution, I'm not sure
> >>
> >> If we downgrade glibc to 2.25 in rawhide, we will have to rebuild at
> >> least the following packages right after that because they have a
> >> GLIBC_2.26 symbol version dependency:
> >>
> >>  inn-2.6.1-6.fc27.src.rpm
> >>  remctl-3.13-4.fc27.src.rpm
> >>  sudo-1.8.20p2-1.fc27.src.rpm
> >>  tmux-2.5-1.fc27.src.rpm
> >>  unbound-1.6.4-1.fc27.src.rpm
> >>  xorg-x11-server-1.19.3-6.fc27.src.rpm
> >>
> >> Besides the glibc downgrade, I'm not aware of anything else we could do
> >> to get ready for the mass rebuild in time.
> > So, I had a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=F26FTBFS,
> > and the situation is not good :( There's 621 open bugs on that list,
> > and it's quite likely most of those packages will FTBFS on 27 too.
>
> There used to be times, when FTBFS packages were remove once in a while ...

Even assuming that we started the removal process for those packages,
it's not going to happen today, and IIUC, the mass rebuild is supposed
to start real soon now. The rebuild is supposed to test recent changes in
gcc/glibc/whatever and uncover issues, so it'll not help if
so many packages are failing to build because of other reasons.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux