Just to don't confuse you:
I kinda used your Mass Rebuild for my intensions - updgrade of MariaDB library. So there will be some packages broken by me.
But we actively monitoring and fixing them.
I be glad, if the Mass Rebuild started *after* this build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20495924, however s390 seems stuck for half an hour by now :(
But go on, star when you need, don't get blocked by me.
Thanks! :)
But we actively monitoring and fixing them.
I be glad, if the Mass Rebuild started *after* this build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20495924, however s390 seems stuck for half an hour by now :(
But go on, star when you need, don't get blocked by me.
Thanks! :)
--
Michal Schorm
Associate Software Engineer
Core Services - Databases Team
Red Hat
Core Services - Databases Team
Red Hat
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 07:48:00AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 12.7.2017 v 16:09 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 02:53:36PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> We currently have an invalid IFUNC resolver in libgcc.a on POWER
> >> (rhbz#1467526). glibc in rawhide recently started linking that into the
> >> library and there are significant problems with that (rhbz#1467518).
> >>
> >> I'll be on PTO next week, and it does not seem likely that this is going
> >> to be resolved upstream before that. If upstream (both glibc GCC are
> >> involved) don't come up with a solution, I'm not sure
> >>
> >> If we downgrade glibc to 2.25 in rawhide, we will have to rebuild at
> >> least the following packages right after that because they have a
> >> GLIBC_2.26 symbol version dependency:
> >>
> >> inn-2.6.1-6.fc27.src.rpm
> >> remctl-3.13-4.fc27.src.rpm
> >> sudo-1.8.20p2-1.fc27.src.rpm
> >> tmux-2.5-1.fc27.src.rpm
> >> unbound-1.6.4-1.fc27.src.rpm
> >> xorg-x11-server-1.19.3-6.fc27.src.rpm Even assuming that we started the removal process for those packages,
> >>
> >> Besides the glibc downgrade, I'm not aware of anything else we could do
> >> to get ready for the mass rebuild in time.
> > So, I had a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=F26FTBFS ,
> > and the situation is not good :( There's 621 open bugs on that list,
> > and it's quite likely most of those packages will FTBFS on 27 too.
>
> There used to be times, when FTBFS packages were remove once in a while ...
it's not going to happen today, and IIUC, the mass rebuild is supposed
to start real soon now. The rebuild is supposed to test recent changes in
gcc/glibc/whatever and uncover issues, so it'll not help if
so many packages are failing to build because of other reasons.
Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
