Re: Fedora 27 mass rebuild at risk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 02:53:36PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> We currently have an invalid IFUNC resolver in libgcc.a on POWER
> (rhbz#1467526).  glibc in rawhide recently started linking that into the
> library and there are significant problems with that (rhbz#1467518).
> 
> I'll be on PTO next week, and it does not seem likely that this is going
> to be resolved upstream before that.  If upstream (both glibc GCC are
> involved) don't come up with a solution, I'm not sure
> 
> If we downgrade glibc to 2.25 in rawhide, we will have to rebuild at
> least the following packages right after that because they have a
> GLIBC_2.26 symbol version dependency:
> 
>  inn-2.6.1-6.fc27.src.rpm
>  remctl-3.13-4.fc27.src.rpm
>  sudo-1.8.20p2-1.fc27.src.rpm
>  tmux-2.5-1.fc27.src.rpm
>  unbound-1.6.4-1.fc27.src.rpm
>  xorg-x11-server-1.19.3-6.fc27.src.rpm
> 
> Besides the glibc downgrade, I'm not aware of anything else we could do
> to get ready for the mass rebuild in time.

So, I had a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=F26FTBFS,
and the situation is not good :( There's 621 open bugs on that list,
and it's quite likely most of those packages will FTBFS on 27 too.

All packagers should pitch in to reduce this list before the mass rebuild
starts.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux