Dne 12.7.2017 v 16:09 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 02:53:36PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> We currently have an invalid IFUNC resolver in libgcc.a on POWER >> (rhbz#1467526). glibc in rawhide recently started linking that into the >> library and there are significant problems with that (rhbz#1467518). >> >> I'll be on PTO next week, and it does not seem likely that this is going >> to be resolved upstream before that. If upstream (both glibc GCC are >> involved) don't come up with a solution, I'm not sure >> >> If we downgrade glibc to 2.25 in rawhide, we will have to rebuild at >> least the following packages right after that because they have a >> GLIBC_2.26 symbol version dependency: >> >> inn-2.6.1-6.fc27.src.rpm >> remctl-3.13-4.fc27.src.rpm >> sudo-1.8.20p2-1.fc27.src.rpm >> tmux-2.5-1.fc27.src.rpm >> unbound-1.6.4-1.fc27.src.rpm >> xorg-x11-server-1.19.3-6.fc27.src.rpm >> >> Besides the glibc downgrade, I'm not aware of anything else we could do >> to get ready for the mass rebuild in time. > So, I had a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=F26FTBFS, > and the situation is not good :( There's 621 open bugs on that list, > and it's quite likely most of those packages will FTBFS on 27 too. There used to be times, when FTBFS packages were remove once in a while ... Vít _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
