Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 01:44:29PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > support. As noted in this thread, this isn't just Red Hat -- it is true
> > of upstream i686 as well. No one is really interested in this. I
> > guarantee you that if some non-Red Hat person showed up and said "Hey,
> > I'm here to work on i686 N hours per week", we would say "awesome", not
> > "Red Hat doesn't care".
> Would it be possible to make this a Prioritized Bug?
> It seems to be a classic case of "affects a lot of people, nobody seems
> to want to take interest".

Hmmm. I'm not sure it's a good fit. I hope for priotized bugs to be
things we can chase down and get some action on in the near term. This
seems bigger and less specific than that.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux