Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 02:36:22PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >that is FUD and polemic
> Well, I of course have disagree. The course Fedora has taken is
> obvious: Servers and  containers.

I don't understand this perception. Yes, servers and containers are
important. But we pretty clearly have a prominent top-level
desktop-focused edition (Workstation, of course) plus *seven* other
desktop spins plus several desktop-focused labs. A large portion of the
articles we publish on Fedora Magazine are desktop-focused. And a huge 
number of Fedora contributors are interested in Linux on the desktop.

Our strategy is and has been to make Fedora relevant in three major
areas: the server room, the cloud, *and* desktops.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux