On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 04:24:22PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Which is yet another generic, non specific call for help. Which > unsurprisingly (given its unspecificness) did probably not get > a lot of response. > > What would be helpful is a concrete list of things people who > care about i686 can work about. For example an i686 kernel tracker > bug + link to that on the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Kernel > page. > > I believe that something among the lines of: "we need help, but we > are not really specifying what, still please do something" is not > going to get you a lot of help. I think this is missing the point. It's not that there are specific things that need to be fixed that need extra emergency attention. I mean, there are, but the problem is higher than that. It's that there is no one interested owning the *overall general maintenance*. That includes making and maintaining the specific help-wanted list you are looking for. If we don't even have anyone who wants to do that, how can we possibly reasonably support the architecture? Meanwhile, I don't personally care about PowerPC (for example), but I know that if there's a problem, these people https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/PowerPC#Members are there to answer. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
