Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 01:43:53PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>
>>> If cost is an issue, consider to drop all these ppc, arm, s370 and
>>> mips targets.
>>>
>>> Their user base is like magnitudes smaller than the i686 user base,
>>> while these target are having a significant impact (and thus cost)
>>> on everything in Fedora.
>>
>>
>> Ralf, you know how this works: Fedora is made up of people, and
>> therefore Fedora does what people show up to do. People are showing up
>> to work on those other architectures, even though they are niche, and
>> *no one* is showing up for i686.
>
>
> That is not true. Let me quote my reply to Josh on this:
>
> """
>
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-February/208368.html
>
> Which is yet another generic, non specific call for help. Which
> unsurprisingly (given its unspecificness) did probably not get
> a lot of response.
>
> What would be helpful is a concrete list of things people who
> care about i686 can work about. For example an i686 kernel tracker
> bug + link to that on the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Kernel
> page.
>
> I believe that something among the lines of: "we need help, but we
> are not really specifying what, still please do something" is not
> going to get you a lot of help.
>
> OTOH "here is a prioritized list of TODO items, if all of the
> high prio items have not been solved before $date, then we are
> going to have to drop ia32 support from F28" OTOH will likely
> be much more effective IMHO. This will cut 2 ways:
> 1) It will likely get the kernel team more help
> 2) If the kernel team does not get help, or not enough, then
> you have a strong argument that not enough people care about
> ia32 bit support and it should be dropped
>
> """
>
> I believe there are 2 problems here:
>
> 1) i686 support is limping on in a state where it more or less
> still just works, so there are no itches to scratch and thus no
> volunteers
>
> 2) There have been some requests of help, but they have IMHO
> not been specific enough. A request for help should really be
> seen as sort of a bug report and just like "the program does
> not work" or "the program is broken" are not useful bug reports
> "we need help" is not a useful request for help.
>

I'd agree with that, I'd happily assist people in getting things into
the kernel that fix specific i686 problems. I do it enough with the
non x86 architectures anyway so I know my way around and there's a bit
of a run up to work out how the kernel stuff in Fedora works.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux