Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 08:44:02AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 01:20:58PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > >The fact that i686 kernels continue to work in general is basically luck.
> > You probably will deny this, but in practice it has been so for many
> > years, because the i686 has dropped out of RHAT's business interest.
> 
> I don't think this is unreasonable. It is easy for us to support
> architectures that a company is paying people to support. It is hard
> for us to support architectures that are not getting that that kind of
> support. As noted in this thread, this isn't just Red Hat -- it is true
> of upstream i686 as well. No one is really interested in this. I
> guarantee you that if some non-Red Hat person showed up and said "Hey,
> I'm here to work on i686 N hours per week", we would say "awesome", not
> "Red Hat doesn't care".

Would it be possible to make this a Prioritized Bug?
It seems to be a classic case of "affects a lot of people, nobody seems
to want to take interest".

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux