On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 13:52:32 +0200 Michael Schroeder <mls@xxxxxxx> wrote: > So, suggesting different databases is fine and all, but they have > to be integrated and well tested. We re-added support for multiple > database just for that, so that we can test things and decide what > to do. Does this mean it would be possible to add support for a real database as an option? Like postgresql or mariahdb or mysql? That would give access to views, triggers, and stored procedures. Then when an rpm update occurred, the views of what it depends on and what depends on it could be updated by a stored procedure triggered by the update. This would also simplify, and speed, dnf since it could just run a sql query to find all dependencies and their versions (I think). And real databases allow granular access to be defined for users per table. Heavy weight solution, but some benefits. Just curious. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
