Correct me if I'm wrong, but the database here is several thousands rows in total, several MBs in size. Every database engine should be fine. We probably care much more about things like ease of development, stability, proper locking and such. > On Jul 10, 2017, at 9:16 AM, Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 02:30:59PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >> Oups, that was meant to be: On which side? > > LDBM was many factors faster than SQLite. No concrete figures, > it was a year ago or so when we decided to go for LMDB (still > a product in development...). I had attended some talk from > Howard Chu (the author) about LMDB and knew quite soon it was > the way to go. > > -- > -- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> > -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Office: +31 20 6938364 > -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Mobile: +31 6 26216181 > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx