On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 02:46:27PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:21:53PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon > >> <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 09:31:22AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> >> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 03:05:43AM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >> >> > 3. The default landing page for a package shows a message about > >> >> > the missing readme. Maybe we could show the %description there in > >> >> > such cases? > >> >> > >> >> Or as an interim, show the spec file? > >> > > >> > What would you think of: http://ambre.pingoured.fr/public/Pagure-DistGit.png ? > >> > > >> > The description comes from the rawhide repo via mdapi. So to update the > >> > description, simply update the package in rawhide. > >> > > >> > You can then simply complement these information with a README file. > >> > >> +1 that looks much better IMO > > > > +1 too, that looks much better. > > > > The icons/links at the bottom look useful, but "Packages" is cryptic > > though — everything is about "packages" in this context. > > They map to the same as the ones say here > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/neard/ Right. My point is that the icon description shouldn't just be "packages" — it should be something which is legible to outside casual contributors. Maybe "Fedora package administration". Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
