Re: Retiring Packages with Broken Dependencies in branched (2017-06-12)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "PR" == Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

PR> But I would be OK with this solution - if this idea was baked into
PR> guidelines first.  Is it realistic to ratify new guidelines
PR> paragraph for this issue before F26?

The packaging committee can certainly get guideline changes implemented
pretty quickly when there's consensus.  But honestly I don't believe
this isn't for FPC to change, and I wouldn't anticipate FPC making any
alterations in this area without buy-in from FESCo and release
engineering first.

 - J<
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux