fre 2005-01-28 klockan 18:40 +0100 skrev Peter Backlund: > fre 2005-01-28 klockan 10:28 -0700 skrev Ivan Gyurdiev: > > On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 18:26 +0100, Peter Backlund wrote: > > > fre 2005-01-28 klockan 10:07 -0700 skrev Ivan Gyurdiev: > > > > > - some sort of alternatives system or post-install scripts to > > > > > find correct provider of libGL.so.1 > > > > > > > > That should be libGL.so. > > > > > > > > Let me demonstrate. After today's X upgrades: > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > [root@localhost ~]# rpm -qa \*nvidia\* \*Mesa\* > > > kernel-module-nvidia-2.6.10-1.741_FC3-1.0.6629-0.lvn.6 > > > kernel-module-nvidia-2.6.9-1.724_FC3-1.0.6629-0.lvn.6 > > > xorg-x11-Mesa-libGLU-6.8.1-12.FC3.21 > > > xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.8.1-12.FC3.21 > > > nvidia-glx-1.0.6629-0.lvn.6 > > > nvidia-glx-devel-1.0.6629-0.lvn.6 > > > > > > Both nvidia-glx and Mesa are installed. > > > > Try this: > > glxinfo|grep version > > > > Are the versions the same? Actually, I was running the nv driver. With the nvidia driver, I have the same version: [peter@localhost ~]$ glxinfo | grep version server glx version string: 1.3 client glx version string: 1.3 OpenGL version string: 1.5.2 NVIDIA 66.29 glu version: 1.3 /Peter
