On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 18:26 +0100, Peter Backlund wrote: > fre 2005-01-28 klockan 10:07 -0700 skrev Ivan Gyurdiev: > > > - some sort of alternatives system or post-install scripts to > > > find correct provider of libGL.so.1 > > > > That should be libGL.so. > > > > Let me demonstrate. After today's X upgrades: > > [snip] > > [root@localhost ~]# rpm -qa \*nvidia\* \*Mesa\* > kernel-module-nvidia-2.6.10-1.741_FC3-1.0.6629-0.lvn.6 > kernel-module-nvidia-2.6.9-1.724_FC3-1.0.6629-0.lvn.6 > xorg-x11-Mesa-libGLU-6.8.1-12.FC3.21 > xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.8.1-12.FC3.21 > nvidia-glx-1.0.6629-0.lvn.6 > nvidia-glx-devel-1.0.6629-0.lvn.6 > > Both nvidia-glx and Mesa are installed. Try this: glxinfo|grep version Are the versions the same? -- Ivan Gyurdiev <ivg2@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cornell University
