fre 2005-01-28 klockan 10:07 -0700 skrev Ivan Gyurdiev:
> > - some sort of alternatives system or post-install scripts to
> > find correct provider of libGL.so.1
>
> That should be libGL.so.
>
> Let me demonstrate. After today's X upgrades:
[snip]
[root@localhost ~]# rpm -qa \*nvidia\* \*Mesa\*
kernel-module-nvidia-2.6.10-1.741_FC3-1.0.6629-0.lvn.6
kernel-module-nvidia-2.6.9-1.724_FC3-1.0.6629-0.lvn.6
xorg-x11-Mesa-libGLU-6.8.1-12.FC3.21
xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.8.1-12.FC3.21
nvidia-glx-1.0.6629-0.lvn.6
nvidia-glx-devel-1.0.6629-0.lvn.6
Both nvidia-glx and Mesa are installed.
Follow libGL.so:
[root@localhost ~]# ls -l /usr/lib/libGL.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 28 5 jan 18.41 /usr/lib/libGL.so -
> ../../usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so
[root@localhost ~]# ls -l /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 5 jan 18.41 /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so ->
libGL.so.1.2
[root@localhost ~]# ls -l /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 474388 1 dec 08.36 /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2
Now, a test program that links to libGL:
[root@localhost ~]# cat test.c
#include <GL/gl.h>
#include <GL/glx.h>
int main() {
return 0;
}
Compile and look for runtime providers (snipped for brevity):
[root@localhost ~]# gcc test.c -lGL
[root@localhost ~]# ldd a.out
libGL.so.1 => /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1 (0x4a8b4000)
libGLcore.so.1 => /usr/lib/nvidia/libGLcore.so.1 (0x4a16d000)
libnvidia-tls.so.1 => /usr/lib/nvidia/tls/libnvidia-tls.so.1
(0x4a8b0000)
What's the problem with this setup?
/Peter
