OK so what kind of problem solves those changes? Can I have look on some bugzilla entry?
kloczek
On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 at 21:47, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 07:25:32PM +0000, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> Seems like splitting langpacks subpackages in all evolution packages few
> minutes ago just started.
> No generall agreement for such changes, ignoring already mentioned
> arguments.
> Seems only just because "we can".
That's true. Within the existing guidelines and policies, we give our
packagers a lot of latitude for solving the problems in the packages
they maintain. If we decide we need a general policy for something, we
can do that, but we don't have to nor do we always want to.
> Guys if you are bored just please undress, sit down next to your clothes
> and watch your cloths. This will be way more productive.
Seriously, please. This is not constructive.
> PS. Did anyone notice that Fedora in popularity ranking on distrowatch.com
> dropped recently?
That seems... decidedly unrelated. And, Distrowatch is a silly thing to
use as a metric for _anything_. As it says itself, the rankings
"correlate neither to usage nor to quality and should not be used to
measure the market share of distributions."
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
Tomasz Kłoczko | Tel: 0774 1209067 | LinkedIn: http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
