Re: Split translations to noarch packages?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 07:25:32PM +0000, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> Seems like splitting langpacks subpackages in all evolution packages few
> minutes ago just started.
> No generall agreement for such changes, ignoring already mentioned
> arguments.
> Seems only just because "we can".

That's true. Within the existing guidelines and policies, we give our
packagers a lot of latitude for solving the problems in the packages
they maintain. If we decide we need a general policy for something, we
can do that, but we don't have to nor do we always want to.
 
> Guys if you are bored just please undress, sit down next to your clothes
> and watch your cloths. This will be way more productive.

Seriously, please. This is not constructive.

> PS. Did anyone notice that Fedora in popularity ranking on distrowatch.com
> dropped recently?

That seems... decidedly unrelated. And, Distrowatch is a silly thing to
use as a metric for _anything_. As it says itself, the rankings
"correlate neither to usage nor to quality and should not be used to
measure the market share of distributions."

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux