Re: GSequencer upstream wants to package for fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/14/2016 11:17 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
You're right, it's better :)

By technology involved, true. But until there is a Fedora (or another distribution) flatpack build service, there is no replacement for a Fedora built RPM package. It doesn't matter you trust the developer, you must if you trust the source code, the problem is trusting random build machines that probably are personal desktop/laptops used for browsing or other things a build machine should not be doing


----- Original Message -----
Bastien Nocera wrote:
I would advise you to look into packaging your application using Flatpak:
http://flatpak.org/
so that you can package your application for both Fedora, and every other
distribution out there that has Flatpak available to it.

That is no replacement for a native RPM package.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux