Re: GSequencer upstream wants to package for fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bastien Nocera wrote:
> You're right, it's better :)

If you define "better" as larger download, higher use of RAM and disk space, 
less system integration, fewer and less timely security fixes and other 
bugfixes, etc., then yes, Flatpak is "better". ^^

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Libraries – Flatpak requires 
you to bundle ALL libraries that are not part of the "runtime" bundle. Other 
similar systems even require you to really bundle ALL libraries without 
exception. But even Flatpak's split is nowhere near flexible enough.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux