Re: future of official optical media support in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 14:04 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> > On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 14:37 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > It is essentially the same core issue, yes. It can happen with Yum,
> > > but for some reason, it happens less often.
> > 
> > yum had rather different logic for resolving ambiguous dependencies
> > than libsolv does.
> 
> Is the current behavior documented?  IIRC yum used the shortest package
> name, and then an alphabetic sort.  For the particular case of the
> kernel vs. kernel-debug packages, shortest package name would solve the
> issue.

I don't think it is, no. You could possibly find it with the clue that
it changed substantially between 0.6.13 and 0.6.14 (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192182 ). I've looked at
it before, but don't remember where it is any more. The libsolv repo is
https://github.com/openSUSE/libsolv .
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux