On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Igor Gnatenko <i.gnatenko.brain@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Dec 9, 2016 5:18 PM, "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 11:07:32AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: >> > Anyways, in the big picture, while I don't speak for everyone on >> > the Project Atomic side, I personally point users at CentOS first, >> > unless I have some reason to think they want Fedora. Something like >> > 80% of Fedora usage hitting the mirrors was desktop systems, right? >> > I don't expect that to change personally. >> Although..except for EPEL. And how EPEL works should obviously be >> part of this. Things would feel clearer if EPEL lived in CentOS now >> perhaps. > > Right; in mirror traffic, EPEL is to Fedora Workstation as Workstation > is to Server. :) > > EPEL packages *are* Fedora packages, though — moving the project to > CentOS isn't completely crazy, but would require a lot more integration > and cooperation between the projects. > > That's something I'd like to see anyway. I think there are a lot of > opportunities for this with containers and modularity — if you can just > run Fedora containers on CentOS or RHEL *directly*, why bother > rebuilding them? For a lot of the software that's in EPEL, that's > completely sufficient. For other software, where users would like the > version to match more closely the long lifecycle, maybe there could be > a hand-off from Fedora version to CentOS version. > > Don't know how modularity is related here. It's just about building distro. > Containers, yeah, but please don't kill Fedora. I don't want to run > container for each software I use. RHEL and CentOS people can struggle, but > don't do this with Fedora users. Please stop with hyperbole. Nobody is "killing" Fedora. josh _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
