On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 02:13 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > More to the point: it is entirely awful for the quality of Fedora as a > > whole if Rawhide is allowed to be completely broken for substantial > > periods of time - and this *did* make Rawhide completely broken. > > You may consider it awful, but it is necessary to allow development to be > done. > > > Just about any package set besides minimal could not be installed or > > updated. > > Not true. Plasma does not depend on mutter. But it does depend on several other things that went through the libldb / libtdb complex. KDE images failed to compose and KDE package sets failed to install just like Server and Workstation. (KDE is in fact still broken even now ldb and tdb have been fixed, but that's your problem, not mine...) > > > Several release-blocking deliverables entirely failed to compose. > > If the KDE/Plasma Spin also failed to compose, that would be due to some > unrelated issue. If not, "Just about any package set besides minimal could > not be installed or updated." is untrue. No, the thing you're missing is that the CFLAGS change affected far more things than just GNOME. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
