Re: mutter broken in Rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kamil Paral wrote:
> This serves as a nice example why we need to tweak how Rawhide works if we
> want people actually running on it.

And why do we need that? Rawhide is a place to do development, not a rolling 
release distro.

> So, we either need:
> a) updates-testing for Rawhide - e.g. with auto-push even with 0 karma
> after 3 days, doesn't matter, it would still allow us to prevent many of
> these issues
> or
> b) decouple building and submitting to Rawhide - because the idea that
> everything and anything built is immediately part of the release seems
> very broken to me.

Those proposals will both slow down development to a crawl and prevent us 
from doing our packaging work.

> At least if we want people to use it. If we want just a huge repo of
> frequently broken bleeding edge packages, yes, that's exactly what we
> have.

The latter is exactly what you get when you do actual development. The 
former is a totally impractical illusion.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux