Re: mutter broken in Rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Kamil Paral wrote:
> 
> And why do we need that? Rawhide is a place to do development, not a rolling 
> release distro.

What is the purpose of Rawhide if it could be broken anytime?
I can't understand that, the development could be done and Rawhide could be functional at the same time. It's not exclusive.

If Rawhide is not usable, nobody would use it. And if nobody use Rawhide, it couldn't be tested in many configurations and your development couldn't be tested correctly.

So, you can push in Rawhide when the package doesn't brake the system or the software entirely. It's not interesting to push packages with these issues into Rawhide.

In my work, you can't push a commit or package in devel branch if it is not functional. If you want to do development, you can do that locally before push it, can't you?

And, as mentioned by Adam, Rawhide definition is a rolling functional release. Of course, not recommended for end users, but with functional GUI or software...

Regards,
Charles-Antoine Couret
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux