Adam Williamson wrote:
> More to the point: it is entirely awful for the quality of Fedora as a
> whole if Rawhide is allowed to be completely broken for substantial
> periods of time - and this *did* make Rawhide completely broken.
You may consider it awful, but it is necessary to allow development to be
done.
> Just about any package set besides minimal could not be installed or
> updated.
Not true. Plasma does not depend on mutter.
> Several release-blocking deliverables entirely failed to compose.
If the KDE/Plasma Spin also failed to compose, that would be due to some
unrelated issue. If not, "Just about any package set besides minimal could
not be installed or updated." is untrue.
> This isn't 2005 any more.
Just because there is a different integer written on our calendars now does
not magically make it possible to do development and deliver a usable
rolling release in the same tree.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
