Re: Upgrade path violations in F25

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2016-11-26 at 02:24 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Every release we got always tones of updates in day 0, on upgrades and
> non-live versions everyone will update the computer , if we use
> netinstall iso already include updates, only live versions could have
> breaks , but shouldn't be a better live version with the 500 packages
> updated ? 

If we were going to do this, there would be no point having a freeze in
the first place. It'd be absurd to have a freeze, then cut release
images that ignored it.

The reason for the freeze is to ensure that *the install / deployment
processes themselves* are known quantities. Even if you do a network
install, the code in the installer environment itself is the release-
frozen code. It deploys updated packages, but the installer itself does
not *use* them.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux