Re: Fedora on Macs, removing the release criterion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> On 2016-11-17 07:43 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > 2. The Fedora QA group has 1 mac mini which is very old and is only
> > used for total install and not dual boot. It would not have found this
> > issue. The Fedora QA group also has no one using Mac hardware day to
> > day.
> 
> This bit isn't quite true. We found the bug *on* that Mac Mini. I'm
> worried it's not likely to find *other* bugs that people are likely to
> encounter on the systems they actually want to run Fedora on (newer
> laptops), but it did find this one.

Newer Mac laptops don't have working keyboards or touchpads as they're
not connected through USB internally. That's not Fedora's problem though.
The problem is if the installer doesn't work when the pre-requisite
hardware does.

> The problem is that we didn't get around to running the test until the
> day before the go/no-go. There's a lot of stuff to test, and anything
> which only one person is likely to test is a risk. Frankly speaking,
> given how humans work, things that involve digging some piece of
> hardware you never touch out of a pile and hooking it up to a keyboard
> and mouse and a monitor and power and network is quite likely to get
> passed over in favour of something you can run in a VM. Especially if
> it's 4:30. This is why I have an Unused Arm Devices Pile Of Shame on my
> desk...
> 
> So, partly this is our fault because we could've tested this earlier and
> didn't. But it's also the case that we really need more redundancy in as
> much of the required testing as possible.

Is there any continuous testing done on the images on the installer? Is it
on real hardware? Is it possible to mock hardware setups? Comparing
boot setups on working and non-working installations.

I think it would be possible to do testing that didn't rely quite as much
on manual testing, through regression testing on "mock" hardware (a hacked
up VM with a test disk image), comparing the partition types after installation
against a working setup, comparing the file lists in the boot partition,
etc.

I'm surprised that the Anaconda, and blivet developers aren't taking part
of this conversation. I'd certainly like them to point out all the ways in
which they're already doing what I mentioned, and showing how we could
add more test cases.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux