Re: Recommended upgrade procedure for >1 release upgrades

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/18/2016 07:07 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> W dniu 18.11.2016 o 12:49, Michael Catanzaro pisze:
>> On Fri, 2016-11-18 at 05:37 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>>> but GNOME Software use dnf-plugin-system-upgrade ? if yes , since
>>> then
>>> we have dnf-plugin-system-upgrade should be safe offer ii 
>>
>> No, GNOME Software does not use dnf and never will.
> 
> I knew that packaging in Fedora is one step from madness but now I see
> that it is one step above madness...
> 
> dnf, packagekit, gnome software... how many other tools try to work as
> package upgrading tools in Fedora?
> 
> Or does gnome software uses packagekit? Then why PK does not use dnf?

GNOME Software uses PackageKit and both PackageKit and DNF these days use the
same underlying dependency resolvers. So they're a lot closer than they used to be.

The remaining issues are basically that they don't share a history database or
local file cache, but I think that's being worked on For F26 or F27. (I'll leave
it to Richard Hughes or Kalev Lember to confirm).


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux