On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 07:09:39PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > It's also worth noting that there's a possible scenario where we could > completely nerf the OS X install here. It's a fairly *unlikely* > scenario - the user would have to manually disable journalling on the > macOS partition - but it is *possible*. For instance, they may have > disabled it so they could write to the partition in Linux, for some > reason, and then forgotten to re-enable it. So this bug, at least in > that case, can be even worse than just 'Fedora doesn't boot'. It can be > 'the Fedora installer ate my OS X kernel'. Yeah -- that's what pushed me over the edge on this. That and I'm not *super* keen on the practice of removing blocker criteria whenever we hit them.... > I don't really *like* the thing where we suddenly decide at the end of > the release cycle that we don't like a criterion that *just happens* to > be standing in the way of release after all, and magically say it's not > a criterion any more. It's crappy process. But we have done it before Yeah, that :) -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx