Re: RPM %changelog?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 05:00:21PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> > > Please, no, don't do that. RPM is a standard, the changelog is
>> > > part of that. It would be pretty crappy to just declare we're
>> > > going to stop using RPM changelogs and bake some random new idea
>> > > into our distro's packaging tools instead.
>> > I agree with Adam here.
>>
>> Well, except -- it doesn't come for free. I was just talking to David
>> Shea about something different and he mentioned that changelogs
>> comprise about 40% of RPM metadata, both on disk and in-memory for
>> every transaction.
>
> How about we globally set:
>
> %global _changelog_trimtime %(date +%s -d "1 year ago")
>
> (or 6 months or whatever).
>
> Then git still has the full changelog for anyone that cares, but all
> the rpms have a trimmed changelog.

Yes! This was the parameter I couldn't remember above. I think this
makes sense. The full spec changelog is then kept in dist-git and just
trimmed as part of the build process. No loss and it's uniform.

Peter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux